Poker superstar Phil Ivey has received approval that is preliminary a nevada medical marijuana dispensary license in Nevada.
Phil Ivey isn’t smoking one thing, but his future customers may be: Ivey received one of 26 preliminary license approvals for a medical marijuana dispensary from the Las Vegas City Council earlier in the day this week, possibly making the poker superstar among the first operators within the city to supply pot to consumers.
There are even more steps necessary before Ivey gets approval that is final start such a business, but his approval does suggest that the town found him qualified to go on in the licensing procedure.
This week to plead their cases for medical marijuana licenses about 50 potential operators went before the City Council. Those that got approval that is preliminary the city will now have to be approved by the state health department.
The City Council will eventually hold a suitability that is final for all those approved by the state before awarding a restricted number of licenses which have been set aside for Las Vegas.
Meaning that Ivey still has a long way to go before getting a last go-ahead to dispense medical cannabis in Sin City. But as he makes pot-sized bets at the poker table if he can make his way through the various licensing stages, Ivey might end up slinging weed just as prolifically.
Council Separate on Licensing Process
There’s been a great deal of controversy over just how Las Vegas has managed the pot licensing process, though that has more related to procedural concerns than such a thing Ivey or every other potential licensee has done.
Councilman Bob Coffin introduced a motion to postpone the proceedings until after Nevada regulators weigh in regarding the suitability of each of the applicants next week. He worried that making opinions that are public applicants before the state made its own guidelines could potentially lead to legal actions, and that waiting could allow the city to approach the matter with an ‘unbiased eye.’
But that motion ultimately failed, as a vote in the issue completed in a tie that is 3-3. Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian and councilman Ricki Barlow also voted to postpone the proceedings, while Mayor Carolyn Goodman, wife of infamous ex-mayor Oscar and mother of an applicatant herself, abstained from the vote.
Among the many candidates that had been approved were developer James Hammer, restaurant owner Michael Morton, and political consultant David Thomas. Nuleaf, a Las Vegas-based company that is owned by a group that operates dispensaries in Ca, had been denied for a license.
‘I believe waiting might have made a difference,’ Nuleaf spokesman Bradley Mayer said. ‘We feel confident that their state will find we’re a very qualified applicant.’
Ivey Headliner of the 12 Months
This is certainly just the latest in a series of headlines made by Ivey that have nothing to do with his prodigious abilities at the poker table.
Probably the biggest headlines happen made in their various edge-sorting cases against Crockfords as well as the Borgata. Ivey already destroyed the Crockfords instance in britain’s High Court of Justice, costing him over $12 million in winnings. a similar instance against the Atlantic City casino is still pending, although in that case, it is the casino that is pursuing recourse to have its payouts returned. Ivey contends that the tactics he utilized in the games don’t represent cheating, while the casinos, maybe not interestingly, disagree.
Final Saturday, Ivey also shut straight down the Ivey Poker site, ending operations just 18 months after the Facebook poker program launched. However, the poker legend said that the shut down had been just a transition for the product.
South Africa Online Gambling Ban Stirs Debate
South Africa is considering a ban on online gambling, along with stronger regulations for land-based betting, such as electronic bingo terminals like these. (Image: OnlineCasinoArchives.co.za)
South Africa’s government is proposing a ban on a range that is wide of activities, including all forms of online gambling and other activities such as dog racing. That proposition is being discussed by the National Gambling Policy Council, which features people from both the national and provincial governments, as well as the Department of Trade and Industry.
Based on department officials, the us government believes it has the capability to enforce regulations on gambling, and that it really is unclear how jobs that are many created by the internet gambling industry. It would additionally scarcely be a move that is unprecedented as much other jurisdictions around the world have outlawed online gambling into the past.
Democratic Alliance Favors Regulation Over Ban
But while many government officials had been enthusiastic in regards to the prospect, the notion of an outright ban was highly denounced by the https://slotsforfun-ca.com/quick-hits-slot-review/ opposition Democratic Alliance.
‘That is just a very, very bad decision,’ said DA trade and industry representative Geordin Hill-Lewis. ‘we fiercely disagree with that view. It is completely shortsighted to say that it is better for Southern Africans never to be permitted to gamble online if you have demand that is patently significant the country to do that. It is for government to facilitate that into the way that is safest possible.’
In other words, the DA position is the fact that online gambling is better controlled through legislation, rather than an outright ban. a full ban, Hill-Lewis said, would cost far excessively in resources to enforce.
But Department of Trade and Industry Deputy Director-General Zodwa Ntuli said that the precise circumstances in Southern Africa meant that a ban would be good policy that is public. She pointed away that the division’s proposal was made after recognizing that South Africa had a relatively high degree of issue gambling and debt contrasted with many countries.
Electronic Bingo Terminals Would Be Limited
If the department’s tips had been to become law, it wouldn’t trigger a ban that is widespread of gambling tasks in the country, but would rather restrict exactly what would be allowed of the traditional types of gaming that are already contained in South Africa. There would additionally be further controls placed on electronic bingo terminals, which are currently allowed by provincial governments, despite the fact that there clearly was no policy that is national the machines.
That conflict caused Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies to issue a moratorium on any licenses that are further the machines. The recommendations that are new notice a cap on the range machines allowed nationwide. It would also attempt to get a grip on the simplicity of access to these machines, with officials saying that gambling must not be allowed in departmental stores, for instance.
The newest regulations would have a framework for allowing the federal government to better oversee the horse industry that is racing. While few details were available, it appeared that probably the most significant changes here would come in the issuing of licenses, a procedure through which the federal government could impact modification on the market.
Gambling regulation in South Africa resembles that of this usa and Canada, at minimum with regards to the interplay between federal and governments that are local. While the federal government sets national policy, it is as much as individual provinces to decide how each will issue licenses and collect revenues from gambling tasks.
Tuesday Massachusetts Casino Repeal Vote Takes Place
Despite long odds, anti-casino forces continue to be hoping for a triumph in Massachusetts. A ‘yes’ vote means ‘no gambling enterprises’. (Image: Repeal the Casino Deal)
A vote that will either lead to Massachusetts casino repeal or towards the matter being put to bed once and for all is coming on Tuesday, though it would simply take a major upset for anti-casino advocates to get their way on Election Day. Those looking to defeat casinos are confusingly looking for voters to vote ‘Yes’ on Question 3, a proposition that would put end to the 2012 law that is allowing the state to license gaming houses throughout the state.
In line with the latest survey by the Western New England University Polling Institute, 59 per cent of likely voters within the state plan to vote ‘No’ regarding the ballot question, meaning ‘yes’ to legal casinos. Only 35 percent plan to vote ‘yes,’ in favor of the repeal. Those numbers represent a major gain for pro-casino forces, since a September poll showed just an 11 percent advantage for ‘no’ voters.
Of course, that’s assuming voters don’t get completely bewildered by the unintuitive ‘yes/no’ phrasing of the ballot initiative itself.
Religious Voters Support Repeal
The numbers show that there has been some success in efforts by spiritual leaders to get parishioners to oppose the casino law, with regular churchgoers being more inclined to vote ‘yes’ than their counterparts that are non-attending. But even Catholics whom attend mass every are opposed to repeal by a 17 percent margin week. In reality, Protestant voters who worship regularly make up about the only real demographic that favor repeal, doing this with a 55-45 margin.
Meanwhile, the advertising efforts by casinos and their allies seem to have been very effective. Support for the repeal in Western Massachusetts is reduced dramatically compared to in prior polls, possibly due to advertising that touted some great benefits of the planned MGM casino in Springfield.
Battle Over Benefits and Consequences
But while anti-casino advocates may be dealing with long odds on Tuesday, they’re still fighting within the final moments to get their message out. Teams like Repeal the Casino Deal believe that the casinos will offer very little economic benefit to the folks of Massachusetts, while increasing unlawful activity and gambling addiction.
‘ The money isn’t coming to the social people of Massachusetts,’ said Al Cabot, an anti-casino advocate. ‘This is simply cash that’s going from one or two casinos in Connecticut to three casinos in Massachusetts.’
Unsurprisingly, those in the casino industry see things just a bit that is little. According to MGM Springfield President Mike Mathis, his company’s casino shall produce a large number of jobs and bring tens of millions of dollars in economic stimulus to the city.
‘We’ve seen what 25 years of no casino can perform,’ Mathis stated. ‘We’d like the possibility.’
Mathis additionally disputes the idea that casinos would simply be taking money that is already invested in Massachusetts and moving it to spending at his business’s resort.
‘A third of our customers are coming from Connecticut,’ Mathis said. ‘This idea that money is dropping through the sky or we’re cannibalizing the market that is local just inaccurate.’
Gambling enterprises in Massachusetts: Pre-Election Status
So far, three licenses have been awarded to create gambling venues in Massachusetts. Combined with MGM casino in Springfield, Wynn Resorts ended up being the champion of the more Boston license, beating out a competing plan by Mohegan Sun at Suffolk Downs in Revere. A license had been also granted to Penn National to build a slots parlor in Plainridge.
While casino opponents may short come up at the polls, just getting the question on the ballot was one thing of a victory. Although campaigners collected plenty of signatures to put the casino question to a referendum, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley originally rejected the question, forcing a showdown in hawaii’s Supreme Court over whether it would ultimately show up on this year’s ballot.