Tennis Match Fixing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Tennis <span id="more-7417"></span>Match Fixing Issues Continue To Make Headlines

Few would accuse anyone of match fixing at Wimbledon, but many say that the practice is widespread among lower-ranked players at smaller events.

Tennis was up against accusations of match fixing for years: through the match that is infamous Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of the public to questions about the integrity of matches in a few smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, there always seems to be something lurking underneath the sport’s surface.

Those concerns were aired again this week in a story by The Daily Beast, which once again attempted to delve through the knowledge out here about tennis and find out the amount of of a challenge match fixing is for the sport.

One 2014 study cited in that tale estimated that one percent of most tournament that is first-round might be fixed, which will mean more than 20 matches a year were influenced by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have suggested that numerous matches per week could be fixed, though that’s still an extremely tiny percentage of all expert tennis matches.

Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players

Why is tennis therefore vulnerable to match fixing?

There are a combination of factors, a lot of which help explain why the issue seems most prominent during the lower levels for the ranks that are professional.

First, there’s the obvious fact that tennis (at least in singles play) is an individual sport.

There was only one individual that needs to be bribed in order to get them to throw a match (the same issue leading many to worry extensive integrity issues in boxing as well as other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to pick the slack up for the player whom is struggling.

Having said that, nobody is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.

For just one, there’s the very fact that these matches have a powerful quantity of scrutiny on them; perhaps even more importantly, though, star tennis players are acutely well compensated, meaning it might price anyone attempting to fix a match at that degree an excessive amount of cash, if it could be done at all.

That isn’t to say that nobody attempts. Even Novak Djokovic has told an account of being provided $100,000 to repair a match back in 2006.

But players on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors are not making nearly that much money, and could even lose cash in an offered tournament after travel and coaching expenses are taken into account.

Which makes them prime targets for gamblers trying to fix a match.

Spot Betting Allows Fixing Without Impacting Match Result

Another problem is the fact that gamblers don’t also have to repair an entire match to find techniques to profit.

Because numerous gambling web sites and bookmakers offer gambling on sets or games that are even individual players can achieve agreements to permit certain activities to take place at the right times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.

‘One particular fix that is common be to split the first two sets up to a predetermined script, then play the third set fairly to determine which player advances,’ activities modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this year.

The Tennis Integrity Unit may be the body tasked with rooting out such issues, and they have actually often made examples of players. In March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption rules, though not for match-fixing.

But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, it is not likely in order to alter the culture that allows lower-ranked players to be incentivized to aid gamblers who want to make sure bets.

That would need a change that is complete how compensation works up and down the different amounts of expert tennis, something that probably will not take place any time soon.

New Jersey Online DDoS Attacks on Regulated Web Sites Arrive with Bitcoin Ransom Notes

Current New Jersey DDoS attacks on unnamed regulated sites had been with a ransom note promising future, much more serious attacks should organizations maybe not comply. (Image:

DDoS (distributed denial of service) is not a truth that any gaming that is online ever desires to deal with, but some regulated brand New Jersey sites had to do just that a week ago.

New Jersey’s fledgling online gambling industry has been targeted, apparently for the time that is first by these distributed attacks.

Later week that is last at least four unnamed web sites were derailed by a hacker, or hackers, who flooded the web sites’ bandwidths with traffic, rendering them inoperable, and ultimately using them offline for around half an hour.

The attacks were associated with a ransom note for a sum that is undisclosed payable in Bitcoin, with a threat of an even more serious attack to follow.

Not New, But Frustrating

DDoS attacks aren’t anything new for the online gambling industry, of program. In fact, they’re as old as the industry it self, but there are suggestions that incidents associated with the unwanted actions have been growing. Some experts even claim that attacks across all online industries actually doubled in 2014.

High-profile operators on the receiving end last year included Betfair, which was targeted on Grand National day, the UK horse race that is biggest meet associated with the year in terms of betting.

Attackers usually time their efforts to coincide with large sporting events in the hope that operators only will pay up as opposed to lose company. PokerStars, Unibet, and state that is swedish monopoly Svenska Spel will also be all recent victims.

Chances of Prosecution Slim

Regardless of the interruption that is initial it appears that the specific situation has become stable and has been efficiently dealt with by the New Jersey market’s cybersecurity teams. The battle between online gambling sites while the hackers is certainly one of cat and mouse, of strategy and counterstrategy: as safety technology improves, so do the hackers’ efforts to breach it.

New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement President David Rebuck said this week that the situation was now being investigated by state police, the FBI, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, in addition to their own organization. The various agencies, he said, were hunting a ‘known actor’ that has ‘done this before.’

Chances of prosecution are slim, nonetheless. Up to now, only two men have been convicted for launching DDoS attacks. Those were two UK-based Poles who made the blunder of threatening an operator they knew personally and agreeing to meet up with him in a resort room. The operator, of course, brought the police with him. In 2013, the pair that is hapless sentenced to 5 years in prison by a court in great britain.

LVS Attack

Such attacks are not limited to online gambling, needless to say. In February 2014, Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVS), owned by anti-online curmudgeon Sheldon Adelson, ended up being put through a massive cyber attack that had been believed to have emanated from Iran. On February 10, LVS was plunged into chaos as computers started flatlining and servers shutting down. Hard drives were cleaned clean as malware ripped through the company’s networks.

The decision was taken to sever the multibillion dollar operation completely from the Internet as hackers began compressing and downloading batches of sensitive files, comprising everything from high-roller credit checks to details of global computer systems.

The attack caused an estimated $20 million worth of damage. The attackers subsequently claimed their DDoS actions had been been encouraged after hearing remarks made by Adelson in 2013 about ‘dropping the bomb’ on Iran.

NY Casino License Bidding Process Receives One Applicant

Tiago Downs, the single bidder for the 4th NY casino license, proposes an improved expansion package having failed to impress last December. (Image:

Regulators in nyc State have actually slim pickings when they come to determine on the winner associated with the 4th Upstate casino license in the economically deprived Southern Tier region.

Just one contender submitted a proposition for Monday’s due date, while a rival pulled away at the final minute.

The Tioga Downs racino in Nichols may be the one and only applicant for the certain area, by having a $195 million expansion proposition to its present facility.

The proposal that is aborted from businessman Jeffrey C. Hyman, was pulled having been dealt ‘a fatal blow’ by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation.

Hyman said his project would have been ‘seismic,’ which may have been what the ecological everyone was complaining about in the place that is first especially when you consider it has an ongoing debate about fracking in the area.


Unfortunately, Jeff Gural, owner of Tioga Downs, neglected to wow the Gaming Control Board at the original certification hearing with his project in December 2014, although he has since come up by having an improved package.

In those days, the board suggested three casino licenses, for Monticello, in the Catskills; Schenectady; and the Finger Lakes area, snubbing the Southern Tier and Tioga Downs entirely, despite having been awarded the powers to suggest a fourth license.

Gural was furious during the decision and highly critical of the board. He argued that the casino in the Southern Tier would be completely logical, as the closest competitor is Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, 90 miles south in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

‘It’s got nothing to complete with me, I can pay for,’ he fumed. ‘but the social people of the Southern Tier?’

‘And what really pisses me down,’ he continued, warming to their theme, ‘is the governor asked me personally to spend $800,000 of my cash to pass law that is local, Proposition One [on the expansion of casino gaming]. What was that all about? I mean… the thing that is whole sickening to be honest with you.’


Such had been the outcry among locals, in fact, that Governor Andrew Cuomo intervened, requesting that the Gaming Commission reconsider.

‘As this would be the license that is last in New York State, it would likely excite national competition by interested parties that submit better still applications than the first round,’ suggested Cuomo. ‘ in the event that you agree to the request, the [casino board] should quickly establish a procedure for the fourth license that could be complete as expeditiously as possible, as the Southern Tier needs jobs and investment now.’

The board complied, a decision it may now regret, itself facing a ‘bidding war’ of one and under political pressure to award a license to a man who has recently been highly critical of its decision making processes as it finds.