I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 due to the fact main-stream news have actually guaranteed really few individuals understand the information regarding the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought to never happen arrested in britain in the beginning while there is no situation, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and you also will know why.
One other thing perhaps maybe not commonly recognized can there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TEST. Most of the proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. The only real general public component is the charging and also the verdict. There clearly was a judge and two advisers directly appointed by governmental events. And that means you never ever would get to know exactly just exactly how clearly the situation is a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You can find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps away I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin perhaps perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become known within the group that is swedish Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had used right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange ended up being likely to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a buddy who was simply trying to find Assange:
“He’s not right here. He’s planned to own intercourse aided by the girl that is cashmere night, not caused it to be. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days previously, on 13 August, she was indeed intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she ended up being ready to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She had been additionally to mention that this attack included enforced non-safe sex and she had been concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex she make no attempt to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in danger of her life on her and this could have transmitted HIV, why did? And exactly why ended up being Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her fuckcams webcams. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into an extremely brief survey regarding the entire Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange arrives in Stockholm for the press meeting organised with a branch for the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and they’ve got consensual sex, from the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this converted into attack by surreptitious mutilation of this condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him in the dais at their press seminar. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to locate a party that is crayfish, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One guest hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stay with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting in the open air at 02:00 and scarcely freezing aided by the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, relating to both their authorities testimonies, rest once again in identical bed that is single and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they don’t. That evening, Anna and Julian go together to, and then leave together from, a supper aided by the leadership associated with the Pirate Party. They again sleep into the exact same sleep.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of prospective assault that is sexual. Another buddy provides Anna to dominate housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is focused on STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat member, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the police can compel Assange to just just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen does not want to signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin produces a broken condom to your authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA upon it, as well as its evidently unused.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead not to ever whine of an attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that was used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is ordinary that certain of a few things occurred:
Ardin had been intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but did not alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange was going to see her in hope of sex.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in public and private with him, behave as his press secretary, and sleep in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him making use of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and appears at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale in to a sexual assault – quite easy given Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape legislation. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities section on 20 August, Wilen texted a buddy at 14.25 “did not require to place any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The next evening at 22.22 she texted “it ended up being law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then made her very own tale of intimate attack. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being sex with Assange, she could maybe not claim non-consensual intercourse. So she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event for the condom that is torn. However the torn condom she produced does not have any trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely think Ardin to be always a liar. On her behalf tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior that will be, within the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say incredibly poor, but that does not matter. Firstly, you had been never ever likely to see all of this detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place completely in key. There isn’t any jury, additionally the federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter the data can be so poor, as merely to cry rape would be to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in ruining a lot of the work and life of Assange. The main points regarding the whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically correct viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to check out the evidence. If you should be maybe not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how will you learn that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that the best way to test these issues is in court, I would personally state needless to say, you will be appropriate, we have to trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and we also should positively condemn the disgraceful behaviour of the whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.